CaseWeb: 1892.0 Thin on the Ground: Deploying Scarce Resources in the October 2007 Southern California Wildfires


		Home \| View Shopping Cart \| Contact Us

Authorized Faculty Review Login

Username :

Password :

Instructors: Register for Authorized Faculty Review Access.
New User Register here !

KSG Faculty & Staff

KSG Faculty & Staff Login

1892.0

Thin on the Ground: Deploying Scarce Resources in the October 2007 Southern California Wildfires

Please login to review case

Abstract:
The October 2007 wildfire siege in southern California posed a major challenge for the state firefighting system. In a three-day span, more than 200 brush fires ignited and, whipped by intense Santa Ana winds, 22 of them grew almost instantly into major, out-of-control wildfires. The state could handle several significant wildfires at once, but to face 22 at once stretched firefighting resources very thin—and surfaced questions about resource shortages and resource management that would reverberate for months to come.

California did have a system for prioritizing scarce resources in this kind of situation. But in 2007, it was not long before every available engine company in the southern California region was out battling a wildfire somewhere. Meantime, as new fires ignited and as established fires spread into new areas, the state decision-makers had no engines to send them. Outside help was on the way, but still hours or days from arriving. On paper, the state had the authority to shift ground crews from one fire to another but traditionally, for a variety of persuasive reasons, did not exercise this authority. The result was that the fire departments in charge of late-breaking fires were forced to go it alone until outside resources arrived—and that could take two to three days.By that point, the heart of the emergency had generally passed.

As a result, fire departments became increasingly reluctant to send mutual aid to early fires in a wildfire siege, fearing that—if a late fire broke in their own jurisdiction—they would have to fight it without help, and would need all their own resources at home. Fire chiefs knew that politically, they would be expected to answer to elected officials, the public, and insurance companies if local houses were destroyed in a wildfire. Reluctance to give mutual aid, however, threatened to severely undermine mutual aid agreements—the linchpin of the emergency response system.

This case confronts students with uncomfortable questions about how to think about—and plan for—resource scarcity in an emergency. Indirectly, it also raises interesting questions about the role of elected officials in an emergency.

Email Abstract to a Colleague

Pages:	26	Exhibits:	Yes
Format:	PAPER	Type:	Case
Curriculum Division:	STM - Strategic Management of Public Organizations	Funding Source:	Funded by Harvard’s National Preparedness Leadership Initiative, a project sponsored by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Date Published:	10/10/2008	Language:	English
Authors:	PAMELA VARLEY
Sponsors:	ARNOLD HOWITT HERMAN "DUTCH" LEONARD

Main Topics:
Law Enforcement, Leadership, Public Administration, National Security, State & Provincial Government, Planning, Economics

Other Topics:
Crisis Management, Distribution and Equity, Domestic Preparedness, Economics, Firefighting/Emergency Medical Services, Law Enforcement, Leadership, Planning, State Politics and Policy

Add to Order?

Please select your price category:

Download/Permission Quantity:
$3.45 ea

Hard Copy Quantity:
$3.95 ea

To add a document to your shopping cart, indicate the desired quantity: download/permission quantity, if you want to receive an electronic download version and/or permission to make copies--or--hard copy, if you want to have the document(s) shipped to you. Click the "Add" button to place the item in your cart. To review or revise the contents of your cart, click View Shopping Cart in the top navigation bar.